Looks like I was correct about him being listed on at least one dating site .... either that or it is extremely co-incidental that after I mention it in the blog and he comes back for another visit here and reads the blog that voila! the listing on the dating site disappears. No, I'm not paranoid, I'm just good at seeing patterns in things, always have been - was one of the things that helped me to help him problem solve .. probably why he sent me that message one night when he was sitting there with computers that wouldn't play nicely saying he missed me and wished I was there to help him (or words to that effect).

I wonder if he had used a different nick on that site so that *she* wouldn't recognise that it was him .... he's done that before. But I knew it was him, hard to miss when you know someone so well. I guess it means they fought in early May and mid-June - or maybe they had been apart all that time ... which would mean he had been apart from her for quite a while when he contacted me... hmm maybe, but if that was the case then why not answer the question .. no, his avoidance of the question indicates that he hadn't been apart from her for long .. still up to his usual way of dealing with things when they're not going his way by the look of it (ie avoidance, deflect or say it's not relevant). Which would mean perhaps they fought at the beginning of May and then again in the middle of June ... sheeesh

And still he seeks to make things difficult, make the road rougher, tougher and nastier than it need be, not keeping to agreements - I really shouldn't be surprised should I, it's his usual modus operandi. And surprised I'm not, but disappointed I am - was him who said something about getting on with our lives, would be far easier to do that if he would stick to his side of the bargain. What a hypocrite. It would help if things went the way they were legally agreed to - I'd have a lot less reason to have him constantly on my mind.... or maybe that's what he wants?